Does everyone think the Android competition class is good?
Does everyone think the Android competition class is good? Why do I feel that besides being good at consuming data, the Android competition class isn't good for much else?
Replies (18)
Android has gravity sensing, 3D, high-definition games, and there are also many apps. You can also port games and apps from Apple and Windows Phone.
You have your Android, but Symbian is my memory. Following the pace of the times, Symbian will eventually decline, but the memories it brings to the Symbian clan will not be erased. The two are incomparable, each should cherish their own.
Tch, you'll know if your phone is rooted... Besides, Nokia also makes Android phones, what does that prove?
Android system source, free. Chinese knockoff phones love it the most. What does it mean that one fifth of the world's population is involved? And Android's ability to imitate, it drove Apple crazy, and imitation is a strong suit of Chinese people. Are there any domestic Symbian phones? Personally, I think it was China that enabled Android's rise.
Personally, I feel that Symbian is easier to use and uses less data than Android! If you're using Android just to play games, you might as well use an iPhone or a computer!
I solemnly declare that I have never had any intention of discriminating against Symbian. I just want to say that any brilliance will eventually be surpassed by what comes after and buried by history; neither Symbian nor Android can escape this. Times are different, and so are their symbols and demands. If Symbian were better than Android, Nokia would not have abandoned Symbian. If Nokia could have developed a system comparable to Android and made it one of the mainstream options, Nokia would not have partnered with Microsoft to vigorously promote Microsoft's Windows Phone system.
Not to mention anything else, there are tons of software, tons of device models, low prices, better experiences, and Symbian has long been retired.
— All replies loaded —