Racing games from EA are good.
Need for Speed 17 and Real Racing 3 are both nearly 2GB, yet their game engines are so good and compatibility so strong that not only do they maintain the original high-definition realistic graphics, but the games also run very smoothly. Gameloft's Asphalt doesn't use as much memory as EA, but it provides different graphics settings for different phones, so the gaming experience can be better or worse. Why doesn't EA make racing games like Asphalt? After playing Real Racing 3, I understand a bit. EA's development team focuses on seriousness and realism; EA's games always have top-notch graphics. They pay more attention to realism and genuine effects, making the game feel closer to reality. The EA team has always been simulating; turning a racing game into something like Asphalt would make their work seem frivolous, but it would also take away some of the fun and thrill. If Gameloft is like someone lively and playful, then EA is like a refined scholar. (Just my personal opinion)
Replies (6)
If you feel the same, don't forget to send flowers, hehe, just think of it as giving flowers easily~ Let me look beautiful~
— All replies loaded —