Weekly Topic #10: Discussing the Forum's 'Castle Conquest Craze'

#Xiaoji's Words# Counting by titles, “One Topic a Week” has been running since the beginning of the year. Although it has gone through several ups and downs, it has managed to reach its 10th issue. Looking back, the overall planning of each issue has been relatively distinctive. Thinking like this, even though there are no highlights and it hasn't received much attention, “One Topic a Week” still reached its 10th issue, so it could be considered a relatively successful column, right? “One Topic a Week” will continue, so please keep supporting it, friends~
Since the release of the game “Castle Conquest,” the friends at 7723 seem to have found something equivalent to a “forum game,” allowing many people to participate and fight alongside their friends. Let's put it this way: although “Castle Conquest” is an online game, in a sense it fills the gap of 7723's games lacking forum interaction. Friends now have something they can all work on together.
Recently, the keyword for 7723 is undoubtedly “Castle Conquest.” From the initial promotion by the site owner to the further marketing efforts, this game gradually became a special case among the online games launched on 7723: unlike the usual situation where games appearing on 7723 are mostly unpopular, “Castle Conquest” experienced a favorable opportunity. This opportunity arose when 7723's popularity was gradually recovering and the site owner was considering new development points for 7723. The site owner's focus on how to restart 7723 was on reform, and the core of the reform was reestablishing interaction with members. “Castle Conquest” isn't a high-quality ‘masterpiece' by any standards, but in the site owner's view, it is definitely a touchstone to try out new “possibilities” (of course, the site owner also simply wanted to get people to play the game with him...→_→)
Yet there's no doubt that, because it received promotion and acceptance, a trend of “Everyone playing Castle Conquest” has formed in 7723.
So, what do you think about this “Castle Conquest craze,” friends?
Play expert @Xin (ID:32878) said: “Well, no matter what, as long as we can play together and be happy, that's enough, isn't it?”\(Xin's comment, though brief, captures the essence of the forum's “Castle Conquest craze”: the forum's purpose is to connect friends emotionally.))
Silver Wolf 〤 (ID:38887) said: 'The only feeling I have is that after the Castle Conquest appeared, the admin's image became more three-dimensional, and his words more vivid.'\(Hehe, although in terms of the topic, Silver Wolf's comment is the most 'unreliable,' isn't it also the most 'constructive'? As for the others, friends can experience them themselves.)\@New Content: Xiao Ji Observation 2: Rockets Summer Trade: The NBA is a business without sentiment \(For much content, please pay attention to the 7723 Baidu Tieba. There you will find love and gay friends, and of course, resources ahead of 7723 or exclusive!)\△Rules\⑴ No abusive remarks are allowed, whether about matters or people.\⑵ Only viewpoints related to the topic can be posted. Using replies for chatting or malicious spamming will be strictly dealt with, and the participant's qualification will be canceled (all their replies in the interactive post will be deleted).\⑶ Interactive posts will be pinned for one week from the date of posting. After that, Xiao Ji will select friends' unique and meaningful replies and edit them into the post content, before closing it. Friends who are selected will receive a reward from Xiao Ji. If you want to review after conclusion, you can find the '2014 "One Week One Topic" Series Interaction' in the special topic to check.