Recently I saw someone discussing the game "Fish Hunting Master" in the music sharing area. As a game reviewer, I would like to use it to talk about the scoring standards of fishing games. Many players will rate based on their feelings, but I think it will be clearer using four dimensions: graphics, gameplay, monetization, and social interaction. Let's talk about it in detail based on this game.
In terms of graphics, Fish Hunting Master claims to be a 3D version. In actual experience, the underwater scenes and turret special effects do have a good visual impact, especially the light effects of the wings and turret skins, which are average to above average among similar games. However, in terms of details, the movements of fish are still a bit stiff, which is inferior to top fishing games. I give it 7.5 points.
In terms of gameplay, the core is still classic fishing + upgrading equipment. The superimposed privileges of turrets and wings significantly improve fishing efficiency in the later stage, but this means that it is easy to feel boring in the early stage because it is essentially repetitive shooting. Not much new, just a change of skin but not of bones. I give it a score of 6.5, passing but not outstanding.
Krypton gold is worth focusing on. The game introduction says "lots of benefits" and "redemption codes dd666, dd123". In fact, these redemption codes can indeed get some gold coins and props, but if you want to get powerful turrets and wings later, you must play for a long time or directly spend money. The charging mode is written as 0 yuan, but it is actually free download + in-app purchase. The benefits are just to attract traffic, but there are many deep-level krypton points, such as various privilege gift packages. I give Krypton Gold Dimension 5 points – it's not so forceful that it's hateful, but it's also far from conscience.
The social aspect is relatively weak, with almost no player interaction except for leaderboards and simple online fishing. Fishing games have weak social genes, but this one doesn't even have a guild or chat system, which is a pity. 3 points, basically no social experience.
Overall score: Picture 7.5 + Gameplay 6.5 + Money 5 + Social 3, with an average score of about 5.5. The advantages are that the graphics are good and the welfare codes are real and effective; the disadvantages are that the gameplay is old, the social interaction is lacking, and the depth of krypton gold is average. If you just want to have fun and get a redemption code, you can give it a try; but if you are looking for in-depth competition or long-term play, this is not recommended.
Do you think my rating dimensions are reasonable? Welcome to discuss your scoring criteria in the comment area🎮