Extremely good news: China’s per capita salary income hits a new low on earth
China's world rankings of per capita income: 78th in 1960, 82nd in 1970, 94th in 1980, 105th in 1990, 106th in 2008, and 127th in 2010; But looking back at China's GDP ranking in the world: 15th in 1978, 10th in 1990, 7th in 1995, 6th in 2000, 4th in 2007, and 2nd in 2010. Other comparisons: Education investment The average proportion of public education funding in the world to GNP is 5.1%, developed countries are 5.3%, Saharan South Africa is 4.6%, India is 3.5%, the least developed countries are 3.3, and China is 2.3% (becoming the country with the least investment in the world?). In 2002, the national financial investment in education accounted for 3.41% of the gross national product, in 2003 it was 3.28%, in 2004 it was 2.7%, and it decreased year by year. China, which accounts for one-fifth of the world's educated population, only spends 1.5% of the world's total education expenditures; the United States has a population of 200 million, and its education expenditures are 700 billion US dollars; China, with a population of 1.3 billion, has only 400 billion US dollars in education expenditures. Beginning in 2003, Kenya, an economically backward country, overcame numerous difficulties and implemented compulsory primary education for the first time. It should be noted that this compulsory education is not that "compulsory education". They are truly free education. Students do not pay any study fees such as books, tuition fees, and miscellaneous fees. Following Kenya, countries such as Malawi, Lesotho, Uganda, Tanzania and Mozambique have also implemented free primary education. The education expenditure of 2/3 African countries exceeds 4% of the gross national product. Medical investment China's public health expenditure accounts for 4.5% of the gross national product, ranking 188th (fourth from the bottom) among 191 countries in the world. The United States is 13.9%, and Switzerland is 10.9%. The minimum investment standard set by the WTO is 5%, and the OECD is 8.4%. China's rural population accounts for 70% of the total population, but medical service expenditures account for less than 20% of the country's total expenditures. China's investment in education and medical care is not comparable to that of Uganda, one of the poorest countries in the world! ! ! China's officially announced official/civilian ratio currently reaches 1:28 (one theory is 1:15), which is definitely the first in the world. The ratio of government officials to civilians in contemporary China is extremely high and is rarely seen in the world. Although the sources of statistical data vary, the figures for the ratio of officials to civilians are roughly the same; for example, from a vertical perspective, the ratio of officials to civilians in my country was 1:7948 people in the Han Dynasty, 1:3927 people in the Tang Dynasty, and 1:2299 people in the Ming Dynasty. In the Qing Dynasty, the population was 1:911, in 1949 it was 1:294 (one said it was 1:600), and today it is 1:30 (one said it is 1:28), and in some places it has even reached an unprecedented 1:9 (for example, in Huanglong County, Shaanxi Province, 9 farmers support 1 cadre); From a horizontal perspective: The ratio of officials in China in 1999 was 1:30, Indonesia was 1:98, Japan was 1:150, France was 1:164, and the United States was 1:187. The grassroots government in rural society is a typical "food-based finance", with administrative fees and salary expenditures accounting for 80% to 90% of local fiscal revenue. Extraordinary good news: China's per capita salary income has hit a new low on the planet. In 2009, China's per capita salary income accounted for 8% of GDP, which dropped from 12% in 2008 to 8%, which is lower than Africa. It remains the worst in the world and hit a new low on the planet. Author: Fat Boy His Uncle Reply Date: 2011-12-03 08:28:44 Investments related to people's lives are low, which ones are high? For example, military expenditures, government expenditures, etc.
Replies (6)
\("▔□▔)/ No way
.........
There are still too many people in China. If you gave one yuan to every registered person in China, it would cost one and a half billion yuan~~ Not to mention there are also people without household registration~~
According to what was learned in political class, common prosperity does not mean being wealthy at the same time... It is divided into those who get rich first and those who get rich later, with the former helping the latter to become wealthy, except that all of our first-to-be-rich people have gone abroad...>3<
The Guo family's policy is to let some people get rich first, and then eliminate those who are not wealthy, in order to achieve the goal of common prosperity.
Ha, embarrassed!
— All replies loaded —